Posted by: ne0 March 28, 2016
Login in to Rate this Post:
2 
? 
Liked by
?
Liked by
An endorsement of Hillary in the name of children is the most uninformed statement that can me made. That statement sound more like "Bombing for peace is like f%%&ing for virginity."
Hillary, who takes money from and who is indebted to the military industrial complex, Hillary who has been as pro-war as can be, who has voted, facilitated and orchestrated multiple wars and regime changes. Hillary's tilt towards perpetual war can be detrimental to the future of children as the more wars that US gets into, it creates more enemies which creates a more dangerous world for children. At the rate in which wars are propagated and endorsed by Hillary, by the time your children grows up the world will be a very unsafe place. At this rate, your kids may even have to be drafted young by the US government to keep up with the manufactured war rhetorics. So if you care for children you may want to think again. As for Bernie he has beautifully said "No more wars". Unless it's the last possible resort. Bernie has questioned the military spending of the US which is 10 times that of the next 10 largest military powers combined. All this excessive spending is due to politicians being in the pocket of the military industry to further their war profiteering.
Hillary, who has taken money from the prison for profit industry, is indebted to sweetening the government contracts in their favor. What that means is your children are more likely to be incarcerated for insignificant misdemeanors just to meet the quota of the corrupt prison for profit industry. So no, Hillary's inclinations towards this industry is likely to be bad for your kids.
Hillary who has taken money from fossil fuel industry is keen on helping those whose primary goals are immediate profits and not the long term health of the planet. Such inclination is likely to leave the planet in a very bad state in years to come so no, Hillary is not going to be good for your kids.
Hillary who is indebted to wall street will not be making decisions in favor of your kids future. She will favor the financial institutions tendencies to increase the dependency by manupulating interest rate and dollar values and loans to keep your kids in captive to their demands. In taking money from wall street she has silently endorsed their off shore accounts meant to skip tax money while your kids will have to pay their full share of taxes. Furthermore her affiliation with TPP will ensure that cheap labor outside the country is taken advantage of at the cost of your children having less opportunity to work in the US. So no, HIllary is not going to be good for your kids.
Hillary who is indebted to Monsanto who is bent on hiding genetically modified food which may not even have had enough research done, who wants to put these products in the market. Hillary who is indebted to big pharmaceutical companies whose sole motive is profit by hiking the prices higher than anywhere in the world. Every so often we have children affected with side effect of drugs because these companies do not do enough research and haste to put the drugs in the market. Many people have become unable to bear children due to side effect of drugs. There is big conflict of interest when the person who approves such drugs in the FDA is tied to the pharmaceutical companies. The whole system is rigged to favor the greed of the corporations versus the rights of people to be treated fairly. So no your children will not fare well when Hillary has endorsed these profit mongering pharmaceutical companies.
People may be naive enough to say the contributions does not mean that she has to support them but in taking money from these industries, she is endorsing them. Even common people get prosecuted for buying stolen items, but Hillary has made good on millions of dollars received from Goldman Sachs while Goldman Sachs was slapped with a fine for $5 billion dollars. Are we going to perpetuate this kind of unethical irresponsible politics or are we going to say no?
There is a psychological condition called Stockholm syndrome where the victims of kidnapping begin to empathize with their kidnappers. The US population has been held captive by rich politicians for so long that a lot of people have the stockholm syndrome and still support the same rich politicans who have victimized them over the long run. People really need to wake up.
So on one hand we have a corrupt politician who has taken money from industries whose profits have long depended on suppressing the people and the health of the planet, and on the other hand we have Bernie who is not indebted to any of these industries and whose sole goal is the betterment of the people and the world. So your choice is really simple.
Hillary, who takes money from and who is indebted to the military industrial complex, Hillary who has been as pro-war as can be, who has voted, facilitated and orchestrated multiple wars and regime changes. Hillary's tilt towards perpetual war can be detrimental to the future of children as the more wars that US gets into, it creates more enemies which creates a more dangerous world for children. At the rate in which wars are propagated and endorsed by Hillary, by the time your children grows up the world will be a very unsafe place. At this rate, your kids may even have to be drafted young by the US government to keep up with the manufactured war rhetorics. So if you care for children you may want to think again. As for Bernie he has beautifully said "No more wars". Unless it's the last possible resort. Bernie has questioned the military spending of the US which is 10 times that of the next 10 largest military powers combined. All this excessive spending is due to politicians being in the pocket of the military industry to further their war profiteering.
Hillary, who has taken money from the prison for profit industry, is indebted to sweetening the government contracts in their favor. What that means is your children are more likely to be incarcerated for insignificant misdemeanors just to meet the quota of the corrupt prison for profit industry. So no, Hillary's inclinations towards this industry is likely to be bad for your kids.
Hillary who has taken money from fossil fuel industry is keen on helping those whose primary goals are immediate profits and not the long term health of the planet. Such inclination is likely to leave the planet in a very bad state in years to come so no, Hillary is not going to be good for your kids.
Hillary who is indebted to wall street will not be making decisions in favor of your kids future. She will favor the financial institutions tendencies to increase the dependency by manupulating interest rate and dollar values and loans to keep your kids in captive to their demands. In taking money from wall street she has silently endorsed their off shore accounts meant to skip tax money while your kids will have to pay their full share of taxes. Furthermore her affiliation with TPP will ensure that cheap labor outside the country is taken advantage of at the cost of your children having less opportunity to work in the US. So no, HIllary is not going to be good for your kids.
Hillary who is indebted to Monsanto who is bent on hiding genetically modified food which may not even have had enough research done, who wants to put these products in the market. Hillary who is indebted to big pharmaceutical companies whose sole motive is profit by hiking the prices higher than anywhere in the world. Every so often we have children affected with side effect of drugs because these companies do not do enough research and haste to put the drugs in the market. Many people have become unable to bear children due to side effect of drugs. There is big conflict of interest when the person who approves such drugs in the FDA is tied to the pharmaceutical companies. The whole system is rigged to favor the greed of the corporations versus the rights of people to be treated fairly. So no your children will not fare well when Hillary has endorsed these profit mongering pharmaceutical companies.
People may be naive enough to say the contributions does not mean that she has to support them but in taking money from these industries, she is endorsing them. Even common people get prosecuted for buying stolen items, but Hillary has made good on millions of dollars received from Goldman Sachs while Goldman Sachs was slapped with a fine for $5 billion dollars. Are we going to perpetuate this kind of unethical irresponsible politics or are we going to say no?
There is a psychological condition called Stockholm syndrome where the victims of kidnapping begin to empathize with their kidnappers. The US population has been held captive by rich politicians for so long that a lot of people have the stockholm syndrome and still support the same rich politicans who have victimized them over the long run. People really need to wake up.
So on one hand we have a corrupt politician who has taken money from industries whose profits have long depended on suppressing the people and the health of the planet, and on the other hand we have Bernie who is not indebted to any of these industries and whose sole goal is the betterment of the people and the world. So your choice is really simple.