BT bro, personally I don't have any problem with you standing for or against TPS.. the point I was trying to make here is sometimes you act overconfident... I know you have a good heart and you have interest in diverse subjects... but we can confidently talk about only a few things on which we have in-depth knowledge..nobody is a political pundit here...we are putting our points based on our knowledge and beliefs and making predictions. By making arguments it helps us to do the reality check of each other's points, but we still don't know how our prediction is going to work. I know you always try to make your argument objective by including adequate data and variables, but in an open system like politics there will be many unknown variables. Even the rocket science fails sometimes. So when you weigh all the facts and trends of this election the outcome might be as you predicted, but there is also a possibility of a different outcome. I think the problem is your complete denial of others' points.

The reason I brought that TPS issue here is not to highlight that you were against TPS but to show you how your prediction become wrong in spite of your better understanding and thorough analysis of the subject. The way you gave us the detail description of how the Department of Homeland Security works and your warning not to mess with DHS, I thought nobody knows systems in the US (at least here in Sajha) better than you. You gave us explanation of every possible reason of Nepalese not getting TPS. However, your prediction went wrong. Who knows same can happen again.