Posted by: sidster August 22, 2015
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
I will talk about two "innocent" people.
I guess the meaning of innocence has changed in Nepal. Throwing rocks at police while they are arresting a murderer or coming between the law and the criminal taking the side of the criminal is not "innocence".
I was curious why Nepal police are more liberal than the US police. Imagine two Blacks throwing rocks at police while they are in the middle of capturing a murder, US police would have shot those rock throwers right between the eyes. Those lucky guys only got shot in the legs.
What if those two were Ghaite's aids and had guns with them too? What if they had fired and killed the police officers? The right thing would have been to shoot between the eyes not legs but seems like the officers were kind enough not to do that.
When are public not going to intervene police in action. When the police comes to work with guns you stay out of their business because they have a duty to save their lives and others around them.
I guess the meaning of innocence has changed in Nepal. Throwing rocks at police while they are arresting a murderer or coming between the law and the criminal taking the side of the criminal is not "innocence".
I was curious why Nepal police are more liberal than the US police. Imagine two Blacks throwing rocks at police while they are in the middle of capturing a murder, US police would have shot those rock throwers right between the eyes. Those lucky guys only got shot in the legs.
What if those two were Ghaite's aids and had guns with them too? What if they had fired and killed the police officers? The right thing would have been to shoot between the eyes not legs but seems like the officers were kind enough not to do that.
When are public not going to intervene police in action. When the police comes to work with guns you stay out of their business because they have a duty to save their lives and others around them.