Metta,

I started this thread so that people will  learn from courageous people like Nirmala and her husband. I dont see you writing anyhting ,even a word to praise them but instead used this thread to your advocacy.

You could have shown some decency for their action you know.To do this you dont need to pick some popular slogan. Instaed you started bashing nepals law  about citizenship.

Mentioning my tax amount was just a information but you immidiately jumped to the conclusion that it meant people who contribute  less has no right. Because it suited your point. 

Slogan is not yours, if somehting goes wrong you dont have to take responsibility, you dont have to face consequences,  you dont have to bear financial burden.  still you prefer to dictate your ex country which rule they should make and which they should not .LOL

You dont have the right to dictate how other should run their house you know. 

If you are so much interested in womens plight why dont you start in your own adopted country?

कर तिर्न पनि नपर्ने, सम्स्या आएमा जिम्मेबारी पनि लिन नपर्ने, तर पपुलर स्लोगन ( tyo pani afno hoina ) लिएर आफुले छोडेको  देश लाई अर्ती दिने यो गर्न पर्छ,त्यो गर्न पर्छ भनेर   

त्यो त जस्ले पनि गर्छ नि, नेपालको सम्स्या नै धेरै अर्ती दिने बेक्ती भएर हो

and you even dare to tell that nothing happend by giving citizenship to 2.3 million  forigners without following law. Adding people in a poor country wont effect economy, where you learned that?

today you say Nepal already added 2.3million ppl so giving citizesnhip to another million wont have any negative effect, tomorrow another person will advocate giving citizenship to son in laws. Is there any stop in this downfall? 

 Yeah my friend when I present different possibility it is exaggregation and when you pick up others prepared slogan for your ex country it is intelligence right.

It is interesting to observe that people who dont have to bear responsibility are interested to impose their slogans on Nepal.and nepalhas to followblindly lol,

You already agreed to put restriction,actually this discussion was not necessary at all, I dont know what you want to proove. 

And above all you posted the news,  You know courts follow constitution. They didnt have papers,so it was not easy for her to get citizesnship.That is true everywhere,  if you dont have paper you have to follow some extra procedures.They did and got citizenship thats all.

This PROVES that even if father doesnt have CITIZENSHP card kids will get citizenship if there is enough evidence. There are some restriction which were in place because of Nepals location thats all.

There is no society without problem, every society has its pros and cons. Nepali society also has problems BUT  I already told in my first reply you can not chnage peoples mentality with law. there will always be some bad apple. 

Yes I showed the concern about Nirmala but at the same time I also see people like herself and her husband  very corregeous people in our society. I told in my first reply that we need to encourage positive thoughts, corregaous people who will move our society forward. 

Society will not change overnight. Discussing for the sake of discussion does not bring any fruit to the society. 

पैसा पनि दिन नपर्ने, अपजस पनि लिन नपर्ने, खाली अर्ती मात्र दिन त जस्ले पनि दिन्छ नि,  आफ्नो अर्ती आँफै सँग राखे कसो होल ?