-       I beg you now not to deny my rights. LOL. How much can you exaggerate?

-       Have you seen a pie chart of Nepali remittance by countries?

How much do you contribute to Nepali budget? Do you pay tax from the money you earn? If not why you are so interested to tell how Nepal should increase mouths instead of increasing working hands. Till date I have paid a lot of tax, much more than a “sachib” of Nepal woild have paid. And I want my tax money to be used for eligible Nepalis only.

These days it has become so fashionable among politician and ppl living in western countries to adopt a popular slogan to gain popularity but they close eyes how the population will be supported economically. Social security to ppl who didn’t had job in their life time, Free school, free health service, free birthing centers cost money you know ? (Although 50% of these will be siphoned by corrupt politicians.)

In India there are little more than 20 million Bangladeshi and Indians always hate those, don’t want them and always complain that those Bangladeshi taking away opportunity from Indians. Why should not Nepali worried about easy life seeking migrants the from other side of the border.

-       What has this got to do with current discussion again? Are you going to give weights based on person’s income and paid tax? What kind of logic is this?

-       How will I become popular?

Here I would look the situation in different way. The question is why someone wants to live in Nepal instead of India where he has full right?

-       Why? You answer. I am talking about providing citizenship to those kids living their most of life in Nepal.

If you are not paying tax to Nepal, you don’t have right to increase the burden of other Nepal tax payers.

-       What burden are you talking about?

-       If I say I pay tax, will you support to give women their rights?

It has become a fashion in sajha or in other nepali websites for  ex Nepalis to gain virtual popularity by posting, accepting popular slogan. I would like to request those people stay away from interfering nepals policy. Once you gave up Nepali citizenship you already lost that right.  Positive contributions are always welcome off course.

-       You’re the master on exaggerating, aren’t you?

-       So all what I’ve been saying are NEGATIVE?

-       How and who will differentiate between positive and negative contributions?

Once women will start to have property in their name they will also think twice to say someone else is her son/daughter because he/she can legally ask for property from mother too. 

-       Here you go again with your DISTRUST on women.

-       Why do you think that these WOMEN are asking to provide citizenship for someone else’s kids?

Here I don’t have to say any thing you compare Nirmala adhikari who had such a tragic time in her life and those women who failed to prepare proper documents for their kids.

-       You showed concern for Nirmala Adhikari’s suffering. I think it has to do with our current law and society’s thinking. Whenever women or minorities protest against discrimination, oppressive society brings religion/culture/economy/nationality/propaganda/western agenda, etc.

Tell me which law prevents me to say dumb to dumb people? Western society teaches you to tell truth. I am not saying dumb to all women am I?  I posted this thread because I was impressed by courage Nirmala adhikari and her husband showed. You failed to notice that. What do you think? all women are intelligent or what. I will always say dumb to dumb people be they be a man or women. Intelligent to intelligent people, I don’t discriminate based on gender.

And, I am sorry, who are you to take away my right to say dumb to dumb people.

-       I don’t want to deny anyone of their rights.

-       I got the impression that you’re calling dumb to those women who don’t have citizenship for their kids. I don’t think they’re dumb. Our SOCIETY and EXISTING LAWS want to make them look like dumb.