Posted by: meraj December 22, 2014
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Cardinal Bro – I really didn’t understand your point on your last post. But any way, my example of rescue was just one example. Government of Nepal is responsible for many other services/ consular services for its passport holder and I don’t think true asylee wants those services from home country from where they ran for fear for their life, and also not all time people are in position to make decisions in time of emergency.
And also I get change to read this whole thread, again, and I have to say, some comments to yaaku are not fair. I know this thread is not about people’s asylum application fake or not, but if we see with common sense approach, it will come down to that. Basic question is, why would asylee need passport from home country? If applicant is true asylee, I don’t see they would want it, until the scenario changes in favorable way for them to go back home. And if they return home, they can fight in court system or I think they will just get it. If they are fake applicant, they will need it, cause they want to go home and they can’t use travel document for that. So, it really does matter, if the applicant has true or fake intention.
And regarding Nepal government taking decision, again common sense approach like our Chai Party Fellows , Nepal is country without constitution right, law to define this, is way too low in food chain. And governments being executive body have a full right to define gray area in regulation, unless it is over thrown by congress or judicial. So, unless there is clear law for it, it is government of Nepal, who will decide how to handle it.
Now will it be defined in LAW, that asylee of Nepal should get passport renewed soon, doesn’t look like. Looks like back channel negotiation is only way out for now. Seems like decision of filing asylum, without true reason or risk on life, will come heavy on some people. Some sort of dual citizenship or dual right will come sooner or later, but do asylee will be eligible for that, let’s see how law will be crafted. Haa. i love these free time on holiday season, bunch of free time to type long post on sajha..
And also I get change to read this whole thread, again, and I have to say, some comments to yaaku are not fair. I know this thread is not about people’s asylum application fake or not, but if we see with common sense approach, it will come down to that. Basic question is, why would asylee need passport from home country? If applicant is true asylee, I don’t see they would want it, until the scenario changes in favorable way for them to go back home. And if they return home, they can fight in court system or I think they will just get it. If they are fake applicant, they will need it, cause they want to go home and they can’t use travel document for that. So, it really does matter, if the applicant has true or fake intention.
And regarding Nepal government taking decision, again common sense approach like our Chai Party Fellows , Nepal is country without constitution right, law to define this, is way too low in food chain. And governments being executive body have a full right to define gray area in regulation, unless it is over thrown by congress or judicial. So, unless there is clear law for it, it is government of Nepal, who will decide how to handle it.
Now will it be defined in LAW, that asylee of Nepal should get passport renewed soon, doesn’t look like. Looks like back channel negotiation is only way out for now. Seems like decision of filing asylum, without true reason or risk on life, will come heavy on some people. Some sort of dual citizenship or dual right will come sooner or later, but do asylee will be eligible for that, let’s see how law will be crafted. Haa. i love these free time on holiday season, bunch of free time to type long post on sajha..