Yes they should have been charged.There is a law for it and she can easily do it.The only person to charge such a case against the newspaper that came up with such a stagnant news is madam Dilshova herself and without her permit,no one can file a case in this subject.....but she is silent!.Almost all media person know the laws about what to print and what not but they too, are silent...Either the blame is true; if not, why is she not pursuing help from the court to clear the air;or,after such a heinous publicity,she has lost faith in humanity and now gives dam to all and is in "leave me alone for some days" situation.Either way,this case is one of a kind and with such a samaritan in question..she definitely should come front and file a case against them and help punish the blind editors who casually print anything they wish,which is then read as a truth by public.She should go to court for other's sake as well, as, not only it is a matter of a lady who is helping poor and old but also about all the NGOs and INGOs that are operating freely in the country.People need answers.If both parties remain silent without doing anything in this case,it will only brew more doubts among people and people will definitely think twice,will look from head to toe,will be suspicious whenever they see any social worker;no matter how great he/she is.