Posted by: San March 2, 2014
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
I appreciate everyone's opinions here.
People are bound to have differences in a democratic society and so it is only natural to have people having different opinions regarding this issue.
Few people have expressed that the important thing here is the mismanagement, bad sanitation, and financial transparency.
The importance of good management and good organization is a universal truth which does not need to be restated.
Personally, for me this is about people like you and me who are trying to choose which side to support in the face of a false, sensationalized defamation of character and portrayal of a respectable citizen as as sexual abuser/exploiter without any proof.
Now some of us see the absolute ridiculousness of the whole media circus and find it fundamentally wrong to publicly defame someone's good name with the ultimate insult of sexual deviant. Some of us however choose to scratch the legality and working condition of Dilshova institution AS IF all other institutions are all operating legally in all possible way (Are all institutions using legal paid softwares?).
I am not saying that mismanagement is the way to go! There are obvious things that we do not need to argue about. Management is good, transparency is good, doing things in a legal way is good, sanitation is good. Noone has to take the higher ground and preach these things.
In my opinion, the only preaching that is needed here is the absolutely horrendous lack of judgment and ethics shown by the involved media in demonizing a respectable individual as a sexual miscreant. And thus my stance on this issue.
You are free to scratch into the underlying good management, transparency, legality, sanitation, which as I said are obvious things which would be good for any institution.
People are bound to have differences in a democratic society and so it is only natural to have people having different opinions regarding this issue.
Few people have expressed that the important thing here is the mismanagement, bad sanitation, and financial transparency.
The importance of good management and good organization is a universal truth which does not need to be restated.
Personally, for me this is about people like you and me who are trying to choose which side to support in the face of a false, sensationalized defamation of character and portrayal of a respectable citizen as as sexual abuser/exploiter without any proof.
Now some of us see the absolute ridiculousness of the whole media circus and find it fundamentally wrong to publicly defame someone's good name with the ultimate insult of sexual deviant. Some of us however choose to scratch the legality and working condition of Dilshova institution AS IF all other institutions are all operating legally in all possible way (Are all institutions using legal paid softwares?).
I am not saying that mismanagement is the way to go! There are obvious things that we do not need to argue about. Management is good, transparency is good, doing things in a legal way is good, sanitation is good. Noone has to take the higher ground and preach these things.
In my opinion, the only preaching that is needed here is the absolutely horrendous lack of judgment and ethics shown by the involved media in demonizing a respectable individual as a sexual miscreant. And thus my stance on this issue.
You are free to scratch into the underlying good management, transparency, legality, sanitation, which as I said are obvious things which would be good for any institution.