Looks like it is going to be a busy day today,

Riddle

My answer  was only for your last post 'Calm down guys calm down........, not the posts before. just to let you know that  in this thread I am not discussing  the Buddha’s' birth place I am  discussing ppls constitutional right  for peaceful demonstration. Why?? Because I respected your personal freedom. you may not like it, In this thread  I consider least about where Buddha was born, My main concern is to show respect to others right of expression even though personally you may not like it.

The title of the thread is  "was  it necessary.....? 

here My point of discussion is " we need to show respect for others constitutional right even if  we may not like it. And if we start complaining about others democratic practices then what type of society we are expecting? and we will be discussing all sort of things we dont like even though the thing we don’t like was lawful action.

Behoove, 

Just saying or displaying "Buddha was born in Nepal not in India" does not make one anti Indian or India hater. If a peaceful expression of your belief to your friend is considered against that friend then he is not your friend. If some one is your friend you must be able to disagree with him on the subjects which you think is not factual. If you can not do that then he is not your friend or the relationship is not friendly.

I consider India is a friend of Nepal and vise versa so Nepal/Nepalese must be able to stand and disagree on matters which Nepal/Nepalese think is not true. If you disagree with your friend are you against your friend? i believe not. 
Here I disagreed with you, do you think I am  against you?

Let me give some hot contemporary example 

At present , Us wanted to strike Syria, British parliament voted against British involvement, Canada says no to any involvement , and Jordan said it will not allow its land as a launching pad unless there is a UN resolution.

so,  are British against US? are Canadian against US? Are Jordanian against US? will British and US relation be affected by this British parliament vote against war. 

Will US Canadian relation will have negative impact when Canadian said they don’t want to involve. ?
Will US stop helping Jordan because they won’t let US to use their land to attack against Syria. We all know at present US prestige is at stake, even then its closest ally don’t want to get involved.

Whereas Turkey is pressing US for strong action and willing to help, who do you think US will consider its closest ally ? Turkey or British 
Even though British don’t want to get involved US will not think Uk is against US.

Official Indian position is --Buddha was born in Nepal, they have told many times, but unofficial media have claimed otherwise at times.
If it was a hateful message, If it was a derogatory message, If it was against our law Then  I could have agreed with OP, but it was unofficial complain about unofficial claim.
It was done during the match, it was a good idea because you can deliver the message through out the word, It was very economical. 
the message was not about destroying the India, the message didn’t  spell a bad word about India, the message was not supporting any terrorism in India.

My friend, saying "Buddha was born in Nepal”, neither makes those demonstrators anti Indian nor India haters. 

That just indicates they disagree what Indians are claiming unofficially, and one of the best way to show your disagreement is peaceful demonstration.
Peaceful demonstration should be respected even if you don’t agree with it, otherwise how pppl will express their disagreement?
Only in autocratic society peaceful demonstration are considered unnecessary.

ulf,

Nepal and India are neighbors, just displaying "Buddha was born in Nepal not in India "  will  destroy peace and harmony between two countries? Is friendship between Nepal and India is such delicate thing?
UK can remain Us's closest ally even after voting against US initiation in Syria but Nepalese will destroy peace and harmony just by a simple display? is this a friendship ?

Nepal government official position is also "Buddha was born in Nepal, not in India. Then how come displaying Nepal Government's official position is aggressiveness against India?
Is Nepal governments’ Official position is aggressive towards India?

Have you ever thought may be India does not think it as aggressiveness towards it? and why should India think the display as aggressive towards it?

Is expressing you disagreement in a peaceful manner is considered aggressiveness? May be you are punishing Nepal and Nepalese by your imagination only.

Somewhere I read following story

एउटा गांव मा २ जना चोर बस्दा रहेछन , गाउले को समान चोरेर हैरान पारेका रहेछन. गाउले हरुलाई संका त रहेछ तर प्रमण रैञ्च तिनीहरुले चोरेको भनेर. 

एक दिन एकजना चोर ले अर्को चोर लाई भनेछ , हेर साथी कति दिन चोरेर जिबन बिताउने, हामी संग चोरेको पैसा छदै छ, गाउँ नजिक चिनी मिल खुले को छ. चोरेको पैसा ले खेत किनु , खेत मा उखु रोपौ , उखु चिनी मिल लै बेचु , पैसा कमाई हालिन्छ ,

 अर्को ले हुन्छ भनेछ , तर भनेछ इ गाउले को समान चोरेर हामीले इन्हारू लाई दुखः दियका छौ, हामीले रोपेको उखु बारी मा उखु सुके पछि गाउले हरुले आगो  लगाई दिए भने त उखु जली हाल्छ, आनी के गर्नु भने छ 

अर्को चोर ले, अ हों त नि, के गर्ने ह भनेर विचार गरेछ अनी भनेछ, पख इ गाउले हरुलाई, हाम्रो उखु बारी मा आगो लगाउने होइन? इन्हारू को घर घर मा आहो लगाउन पर्छ भनेर त्यो रात सबै गाउले को घर मा आगो लगाई दिएछन 

दुइ जना चोर