Posted by: Eutab4 June 30, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Hahahah Giardino, peace pal!! It's just a discussion. We all are certainly going to live.
Kiddo, are you somehow offended by my comments? I am not proposing to force my way into everyone's throat. Not at all. I am not really, still why are you so afraid of looking 'in' from the western's viewpoint? I don't see that vaste difference in the cultural progression of societies. Didn't all the societies start basically from the same 'eye for an eye' status? Aren't all basically following the same path? Call it modernism, call it democracy, call it westernization, call it whatever...all are headed in the same direction..from the US to Nepal, Tashkant to Tehran. Are we all in different timeline of such progression? Absolutely, yes.. Several hundred years difference in some cases. Even upto 1920s, western women didn't show their ankles. We started defying that not too long ago.
Now, let's talk history: basically every culture held that ta/tapai/hazur differentiation. You do recall Shakespearean ye, thy etc; don't you? We are little too lame to get over these.
While majority of the people are into their own lives, perhaps the secluded minority of aristocrats needed some way to distinguish and feel better about themselves. So address each other, strictly within the group, gave a sense of superiority. But you real analyse their mindset, perhaps some people wonder if it in fact an inferiority complex.
I think rethink sees it already, that if you replace 'hazur' by just 'tapai' and so on; the sky is not going to fall.
(Do you truly believe that 'ta' doesn't have any negative impact on our juniors? see how confident the similar aged kids here seem compared to our kids backhome in 'ta' atmoshphere.) Just saying.
Kiddo, are you somehow offended by my comments? I am not proposing to force my way into everyone's throat. Not at all. I am not really, still why are you so afraid of looking 'in' from the western's viewpoint? I don't see that vaste difference in the cultural progression of societies. Didn't all the societies start basically from the same 'eye for an eye' status? Aren't all basically following the same path? Call it modernism, call it democracy, call it westernization, call it whatever...all are headed in the same direction..from the US to Nepal, Tashkant to Tehran. Are we all in different timeline of such progression? Absolutely, yes.. Several hundred years difference in some cases. Even upto 1920s, western women didn't show their ankles. We started defying that not too long ago.
Now, let's talk history: basically every culture held that ta/tapai/hazur differentiation. You do recall Shakespearean ye, thy etc; don't you? We are little too lame to get over these.
While majority of the people are into their own lives, perhaps the secluded minority of aristocrats needed some way to distinguish and feel better about themselves. So address each other, strictly within the group, gave a sense of superiority. But you real analyse their mindset, perhaps some people wonder if it in fact an inferiority complex.
I think rethink sees it already, that if you replace 'hazur' by just 'tapai' and so on; the sky is not going to fall.
(Do you truly believe that 'ta' doesn't have any negative impact on our juniors? see how confident the similar aged kids here seem compared to our kids backhome in 'ta' atmoshphere.) Just saying.