Posted by: ne0 June 14, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Freedom bro,
Rahasya is not mistaken in asking you why you did not ask Ojaswi to apologize. Why do you show hypocrisy in asking certain people to apologize but not Ojaswi? I am sure you would be interested to know that Ojaswi can also be a boy's name (Ojasvi) http://babynames.merschat.com/index.cgi?function=View&bn_key=71740 It would be funny if you were pissed off with Behoove for calling a guy a harlot. But then again you might be thinking about protecting brothers and fathers instead of sisters and mothers.
It's interesting that your whole strong stance you are taking in this thread is pivoting on your assumption that Ojaswi Rana is a girl.
"I do not mean to demean Neo with cake and sh.it analogy. He said Behoove's post is made up a good part(cake) and bad part(sh.it). If Neo, you found it demeaning, do tell me, I had gladly edit it and apologize to you. I am not perfect, ever ready to apologize and correct myself. Mostly so if i hurt someone"
I am not going to ask you to apologize for stooping to this level of analogy. It simply shows your inclination to use improbable and unrealistic analogies to prove your moot point. I will, however, request that in future you use more realistic analogies to prove your points.
"Neo, once again, you need to apologize because you liked a post that made fun of womanhood. And defended it."
After imploring you to spell it out 3 or more times, you have finally spelled it out and I appreciate your forthcoming on this apparently important matter.
As I have already told you, my like is for the whole post, for Behoove's right to express his opinion, for him taking a stance to denounce someone's apparent distasteful action. As I have said, it was not necessary to try to speak on my behalf, but he has every right to post what he felt like.
If I like a post it does not mean that I agree with every word used, and I have already pointed out that I did not and do not endorse any demeaning words to women.
So, at the end of the day, the apology you are demanding is more for your own sake because your definition of "like" is different from mine. And if it makes you happy, I will apologize for thinking differently from you. I apologize to you and anyone else who felt I was offensive to women by liking that post. I hope this puts your reservation to rest.
Next time I like a movie where they use demeaning words to any race, creed, ethnicity or gender, I will be sure to apologize to you for endorsing those demeaning words by liking the movie.
You are like a lonely crusader asking movie watchers to apologize for watching a Nazi movie because you think it is offensive to the victims. I am sure you get your own mental satisfaction by your persistency, but I am sorry to say it is teetering on the edge of ridiculousness to be honest.
Rahasya is not mistaken in asking you why you did not ask Ojaswi to apologize. Why do you show hypocrisy in asking certain people to apologize but not Ojaswi? I am sure you would be interested to know that Ojaswi can also be a boy's name (Ojasvi) http://babynames.merschat.com/index.cgi?function=View&bn_key=71740 It would be funny if you were pissed off with Behoove for calling a guy a harlot. But then again you might be thinking about protecting brothers and fathers instead of sisters and mothers.
It's interesting that your whole strong stance you are taking in this thread is pivoting on your assumption that Ojaswi Rana is a girl.
"I do not mean to demean Neo with cake and sh.it analogy. He said Behoove's post is made up a good part(cake) and bad part(sh.it). If Neo, you found it demeaning, do tell me, I had gladly edit it and apologize to you. I am not perfect, ever ready to apologize and correct myself. Mostly so if i hurt someone"
I am not going to ask you to apologize for stooping to this level of analogy. It simply shows your inclination to use improbable and unrealistic analogies to prove your moot point. I will, however, request that in future you use more realistic analogies to prove your points.
"Neo, once again, you need to apologize because you liked a post that made fun of womanhood. And defended it."
After imploring you to spell it out 3 or more times, you have finally spelled it out and I appreciate your forthcoming on this apparently important matter.
As I have already told you, my like is for the whole post, for Behoove's right to express his opinion, for him taking a stance to denounce someone's apparent distasteful action. As I have said, it was not necessary to try to speak on my behalf, but he has every right to post what he felt like.
If I like a post it does not mean that I agree with every word used, and I have already pointed out that I did not and do not endorse any demeaning words to women.
So, at the end of the day, the apology you are demanding is more for your own sake because your definition of "like" is different from mine. And if it makes you happy, I will apologize for thinking differently from you. I apologize to you and anyone else who felt I was offensive to women by liking that post. I hope this puts your reservation to rest.
Next time I like a movie where they use demeaning words to any race, creed, ethnicity or gender, I will be sure to apologize to you for endorsing those demeaning words by liking the movie.
You are like a lonely crusader asking movie watchers to apologize for watching a Nazi movie because you think it is offensive to the victims. I am sure you get your own mental satisfaction by your persistency, but I am sorry to say it is teetering on the edge of ridiculousness to be honest.