Posted by: ne0 June 13, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Ojaswi
I really hoped this thread would not be dragged on since I had already said that things in chat room should be resolved there and not dragged anywhere else, but since it's been dragged on I will try to answer your query. Although I would rather not have had to reveal why I hinted you trolling, if you must know then, as an admin, I have noticed a while ago that you shared the same identity as far as using same computer with another user sabita_bhabhi who is has been publicy trolling in chat, whose activity I do not want to mention here since what hapens in SB stays in SB, but in any case, I do not have anything against you. I just did not take your "f"words seriously. I have not lost respect for you in any ways. I do understand, however, that you may have issues with some other users like you have mentioned but you will need to resolve those things with them personally.
As far as Freedom2012's urging for apologies, I agree with you that the usage of word 'harlot' was not fitting, and personally I would not endorse the usage of any thing demeaning to anyone. I have even mentioned to Behoove that I don't agree with the usage of 'harlot'. But you cannot base a "like" for a posting to be a full blanket endorsement of everything posted. For instance, if someone says, "I like Obama." Then that doesn't mean they like "everything" that Obama says or does. They may disagree Obama's stance on certain issues, but on the whole, they like him. In the same way, if I likes a post, it means I like the essense of the post, and as I have said in my previous respone, I 'liked' the fact that Behuv stood up for what he thought was right and "condemned" ojaswi's foul action, just like you are asking people to condem Behuv, he also felt it was his moral obligation to condemn her foul display.
If people would be so picky about 'likes' then maybe you would have liked the facility to 'like' each sentence so that you are not confused with what exactly is being liked.
Freedom, do you like every word, and every sentence of a post when you "like" something? Are you demanding an apology because my definition of "like" does not fit with your definition of "like"?
Perhaps, before going on a public campaign to get apologies, a more ideal preliminary round would have been to ask whether or not every who liked behuv's post, endorsed the usage of the word "harlot" and other female related issues. To which question my answer would have been a resounding "NO".
Hope you can move on with my answer. If you have the time or the inclination to dissect my response and prove me wrong please go ahead because I am not changing my stance.
PS: in case anyone is wondering what the sajha chat is or where it is, it can be accessed from the sajha homepage towards the right, under the search section. Or if you are logged in you can access via this link: http://sajha.com/sajha/html/sajhachat.cfm
I really hoped this thread would not be dragged on since I had already said that things in chat room should be resolved there and not dragged anywhere else, but since it's been dragged on I will try to answer your query. Although I would rather not have had to reveal why I hinted you trolling, if you must know then, as an admin, I have noticed a while ago that you shared the same identity as far as using same computer with another user sabita_bhabhi who is has been publicy trolling in chat, whose activity I do not want to mention here since what hapens in SB stays in SB, but in any case, I do not have anything against you. I just did not take your "f"words seriously. I have not lost respect for you in any ways. I do understand, however, that you may have issues with some other users like you have mentioned but you will need to resolve those things with them personally.
As far as Freedom2012's urging for apologies, I agree with you that the usage of word 'harlot' was not fitting, and personally I would not endorse the usage of any thing demeaning to anyone. I have even mentioned to Behoove that I don't agree with the usage of 'harlot'. But you cannot base a "like" for a posting to be a full blanket endorsement of everything posted. For instance, if someone says, "I like Obama." Then that doesn't mean they like "everything" that Obama says or does. They may disagree Obama's stance on certain issues, but on the whole, they like him. In the same way, if I likes a post, it means I like the essense of the post, and as I have said in my previous respone, I 'liked' the fact that Behuv stood up for what he thought was right and "condemned" ojaswi's foul action, just like you are asking people to condem Behuv, he also felt it was his moral obligation to condemn her foul display.
If people would be so picky about 'likes' then maybe you would have liked the facility to 'like' each sentence so that you are not confused with what exactly is being liked.
Freedom, do you like every word, and every sentence of a post when you "like" something? Are you demanding an apology because my definition of "like" does not fit with your definition of "like"?
Perhaps, before going on a public campaign to get apologies, a more ideal preliminary round would have been to ask whether or not every who liked behuv's post, endorsed the usage of the word "harlot" and other female related issues. To which question my answer would have been a resounding "NO".
Hope you can move on with my answer. If you have the time or the inclination to dissect my response and prove me wrong please go ahead because I am not changing my stance.
PS: in case anyone is wondering what the sajha chat is or where it is, it can be accessed from the sajha homepage towards the right, under the search section. Or if you are logged in you can access via this link: http://sajha.com/sajha/html/sajhachat.cfm