Posted by: Kiddo May 21, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
This just sends too many red flags.
If she did what is being claimed, she should be nominated for a bigger prize than just Intel..that too runner-up. The first prize winner came out with auto-driven auto, using camera. Obviously that has downsides since it didn't use infra-red or other detection technology (what do you do in a foggy day?). But, if what has been claimed was right, she created a better "invention" than anybody else.
Let's dissect it. She hasn't created a super-charger that charges fast. What she did was create a nano super capacitor that can be charged in an instant. This capacitor isn't going to charge your cell phone or car battery in an instant (density/sec would be too high and battery will blow up). So, the alternative would be to use this capacitor directly, or to use it to slowly charge inside the gadget. You would charge the capacitor in an instant and the capacitor will slowly power or charge something else.
Not too bad, but we already found one issue with the article that it's not a super charger.
Now going back to the capacitor. Super capacitor theory is not a new invention. People have been working on it for a while, specially in battery alternative technology. Her super capacitor is very small (nano level) so that's a good thing. The cost to produce these capacitors however are high, but since I don't have a data on this, I will digress. Heard about Graphene? Well it solves the problem of scalability and cost. Works on similar theory and charges batteries fast.
So, given all that, the invention is still not bad right? I don't know...if she did it on her own, I would have said the girl is very deserving. But I doubt a lab assistant produced this on her own. Take a gander at this:
http://research.pbsci.ucsc.edu/chemistry/li/publications/2013_AM_25_267_272.pdf
Same Hi-TiO2 technology but her name isn't even mentioned. Notice the last name of the publisher, YAT LI!!! Who's her mentor? Yat Li. (see her submission: http://www.usc.edu/CSSF//History/2013/Projects/S0912.pdf ).
So do we still think this girl invented this thing?
I don't know about you, but I find it hard to believe it. She probably helped in synthesizing it, but she certainly didn't invent it by her own.
If she did what is being claimed, she should be nominated for a bigger prize than just Intel..that too runner-up. The first prize winner came out with auto-driven auto, using camera. Obviously that has downsides since it didn't use infra-red or other detection technology (what do you do in a foggy day?). But, if what has been claimed was right, she created a better "invention" than anybody else.
Let's dissect it. She hasn't created a super-charger that charges fast. What she did was create a nano super capacitor that can be charged in an instant. This capacitor isn't going to charge your cell phone or car battery in an instant (density/sec would be too high and battery will blow up). So, the alternative would be to use this capacitor directly, or to use it to slowly charge inside the gadget. You would charge the capacitor in an instant and the capacitor will slowly power or charge something else.
Not too bad, but we already found one issue with the article that it's not a super charger.
Now going back to the capacitor. Super capacitor theory is not a new invention. People have been working on it for a while, specially in battery alternative technology. Her super capacitor is very small (nano level) so that's a good thing. The cost to produce these capacitors however are high, but since I don't have a data on this, I will digress. Heard about Graphene? Well it solves the problem of scalability and cost. Works on similar theory and charges batteries fast.
So, given all that, the invention is still not bad right? I don't know...if she did it on her own, I would have said the girl is very deserving. But I doubt a lab assistant produced this on her own. Take a gander at this:
http://research.pbsci.ucsc.edu/chemistry/li/publications/2013_AM_25_267_272.pdf
Same Hi-TiO2 technology but her name isn't even mentioned. Notice the last name of the publisher, YAT LI!!! Who's her mentor? Yat Li. (see her submission: http://www.usc.edu/CSSF//History/2013/Projects/S0912.pdf ).
So do we still think this girl invented this thing?
I don't know about you, but I find it hard to believe it. She probably helped in synthesizing it, but she certainly didn't invent it by her own.