Posted by: freedom2012 April 29, 2013
Is Nepal better off as an indian territory?
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?         Liked by
I think if Nepal was really on sale, it would sell like a hotcake. Namely 2 reasons. 1)water resources 2)geographical position. USA would be the first country to respond. USA always seeks geographical advantage. Which better country than Nepal to keep an eye on China, India and Pakistan.

Within 10-20 years, USA will make Nepal into a 1st world country. Others countries will show respect towards the new nepalese americans. No more bullying. No more dirty politics. Population less than 3 crores, in less than 2 decades there will be 100% literacy rate, even the most remotest of location will be linked, hospitals, schools, etc. Buddha would have been born in USA. Mount Everest would be in USA. No campaign is needed. We would be the 52nd state of USA after Puerto Rico joins in before us. 

We will not get as much with india but there will be considerable reduction in poverty. As an indian state, we could make it illegal for people from other states to reside or live in New Nepal. There will be a lot of investments coming in. Perhaps this new nepal could join with sikkim, darjeeling to make a Greater Nepal state within india. This state will have only 2-3 crore population, we will be the richest state of india. And the safest in 10-20 years. 

China would be an option also but China is well know for not giving freedom and suppressing people. So China is out until she improves her image. 

I am freedom2012 and i approve this message.

 
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article