Posted by: GorkheCowboy April 29, 2013
Is Nepal better off as an indian territory?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
 @freedom
Why don't you change your profile name to slave? Word freedom does not suit you. Are you a son/ daughter of a puppet of India who is insisting to sell self-existence?

So you are only the educated person that can think, huh?? You have the real problem of superiority. So mato does not mean anything rite? Did you use to have mato in breakfast, lunch and dinner?  And having your own country is the matter of mato only, right? Where did you learn this?  I am not talking about that thug son of a gun bastard prachande. Don't you think establishment of nepal as a country costed lives of so many nepalese? If ceding to India is only solution why our ancestors sacrificed their lives? Do you think they were idiots? What if after annexing to india nepal becomes another Orrissa, or andhra pradesh or many [Disallowed String for - bad word]ed up states in the northeast? Can you guarantee Nepal will be a flourished country after merge? 

It's all the matter of how you are raised, my friend. Many of us still can't exchange our pride with money India gives. I can understand you come from a very obliged background so you do not know the meaning of what it takes to be independent. 
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article