my friend, 


Tms deleted his comment, I ahd a chance to see his comment, based on his comment I have prepared a comment for you

 lol,


Yours is the weakest, mine  is strongest
Yours is not good, mine is good
Your  argument is wrong, My argument is right

What type of people say that? and that too without any evidence.  Prachanda has changed the stance many times and you are doing the same. looks like you have learned from him

In your analogy before you used the presence of mother as a pro0f for presence of the god, I gave example saying it can be your mother, my mother  and not necessary mother, can be sister or from market, Now you move to Cake ,
my friend , when I denied existence of cake? In  your analogy cake was "us" and you even said which can not be produced from nothing and there must be someone mother (god) which produced it.

This is what happens when you pickup logic from somewhere else, Not from you own thoughts. In thta case you do not know the whole picture.

I gave you explanation saying that it can be your mother (GOD) or someone else's mother (God) or may not even mother can be sister or from market too, This analogy goes against the existence of only one god, possibility of many gods which you have not agreed in previous posts.

Now by accepting the cake was made by someone, you accepted the existence of several gods which goes against your belief

Regarding me being atheist , speak for yourself, I am a open minded guy, what i do is कौवा  ले कान  लग्यो कसैले भन्यो   भने  कौवा को पछाडी भाग्दिना , पैला आफ्नो कान  छामछु 

If i get a proof it wont be difficult for me to accept the presence of god, I am not stubburn. But it is not 15th century, and I am not innocent Nepali who lost their life just listening to What prachanda says. Gone are the days when someone  utter a collection or words and people start believing it.

Of course when the children turn out drug addicts, rapists, the parents will regret. If you read carefully, religion does show that God regretted his decision to a certain extent


That means god is helpless like those parents whose kids turned bad? and he even regretted for some of his action. ?? He didn’t know before? lol,  god is sorry ?? for his malfunctioning products, looks like god messed up everything from the beginning man. If he could not do one thing right, how you still believe he can take you to heaven?

I can imagine the shame and regret Adams and Eve lived with.

My homework to read further, my friend I have read Bible few times, Quran at least once, Buddhist literature few times and Hindu literatures many times. When it comes to god and creation, they all are same, nothing new full of craps. If you read those books as history then only you can learn how the society was operating at that time.

Muslims and Christians actually treating their books as book written by Karl Marks and , and they follow as communist following Marxism. For a devoted communist Marxism is one and all, no change is necessary and look how many ppl died around the world because of that book.

Similarly look how many ppl died because of those religious books. Isn’t it interesting two opposing philosophy behaving same way?
Human changed, society changed, our needs changed  but those books "words of god" still trying to take people to heaven. LOL