Posted by: rethink February 13, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Kiddo, you haste in pointing out fundamental error in logic.
Firstly you respond to Riddle instead of me, another hasty action!
As far as any interpretation of GOD, it is only someone's personal or group interpretation and there is no right or wrong since noone knows the truth, so any flaw you point out does not hold any validity since you do not know the absolute truth!
You said "The counter argument is that God could have a more complex presence than you think." But the counter argument to your argument is that you could be wrong and God could have a more simple presence than you think!
If there are any logical errors then I have no problem accepting them
Firstly you respond to Riddle instead of me, another hasty action!
As far as any interpretation of GOD, it is only someone's personal or group interpretation and there is no right or wrong since noone knows the truth, so any flaw you point out does not hold any validity since you do not know the absolute truth!
You said "The counter argument is that God could have a more complex presence than you think." But the counter argument to your argument is that you could be wrong and God could have a more simple presence than you think!
If there are any logical errors then I have no problem accepting them