Posted by: Eutab4 January 11, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Two thoughts:
1. Together we stand: Even though they were individual tiny little kingdoms, they shared a very similar cultures in most of the times. Reasons for that include but do not limit to; outgrowth from the same kingdom, kingdoms of brothers, same (similar) language/religion etc. Therefore, there was enough reasons for a brave king to rally the brotherhood to save each other's ass. For that unification was the only way to defend themselves from the Angrejs.
2. What if British Ruled?: Some of you so deny the unification so much yet show such an extreme patriotism. Don't you see little bit of irony there? Why not to push the question little further and fully deny PNS and say 'What the ---- would have happened, if British colonized Nepal? Countries build, countries fall....some longer, other shorter in the grand scheme of history. So why they ---- do we actually needed Nepal?
1. Together we stand: Even though they were individual tiny little kingdoms, they shared a very similar cultures in most of the times. Reasons for that include but do not limit to; outgrowth from the same kingdom, kingdoms of brothers, same (similar) language/religion etc. Therefore, there was enough reasons for a brave king to rally the brotherhood to save each other's ass. For that unification was the only way to defend themselves from the Angrejs.
2. What if British Ruled?: Some of you so deny the unification so much yet show such an extreme patriotism. Don't you see little bit of irony there? Why not to push the question little further and fully deny PNS and say 'What the ---- would have happened, if British colonized Nepal? Countries build, countries fall....some longer, other shorter in the grand scheme of history. So why they ---- do we actually needed Nepal?