Posted by: Kiddo January 9, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
I don't think you guys (last few posts) get it.
It's not about what crimes have been committed by the individual; it's about taking over the rights of a country to decide upon its case for its citizen. You all know Kim Jong, Assad and Ahmadinejad are guilty of so many crimes have you seen any country laying their hands on them when they are in UN summit or visit to another country? If the person is guilty, UK should turn over the accused to Nepali government, At the very least, consult Nepal before making the arrest. If Col. Lama is a citizen of UK, then, like rethink said, this is understandable. Did UK even verify what his status is?
It's not about what crimes have been committed by the individual; it's about taking over the rights of a country to decide upon its case for its citizen. You all know Kim Jong, Assad and Ahmadinejad are guilty of so many crimes have you seen any country laying their hands on them when they are in UN summit or visit to another country? If the person is guilty, UK should turn over the accused to Nepali government, At the very least, consult Nepal before making the arrest. If Col. Lama is a citizen of UK, then, like rethink said, this is understandable. Did UK even verify what his status is?