Thanks Snurp,

Thanks for a pick on me.

Let me clearfy my view what I meant.

* She is fabricating a story because in your view, she dressed up inappropriately while giving an interview?
-- Not at all. but if I were such a victim, I would dress up appropriately while interviewing (planned) on Cam. That should not deviate my point of saying. I find difficulty in understanding based on what I pointed out, and not on how she is dressed up.

*  She is covering something up because she chose not to report to authority while in Nepal?
-- At some point it is understandable and she chose not to, because may be there were several compulsive reasons while back in Nepal. However, I cannot hear any of such situations that is keeping her from reporting in US. I don't think she is in a captive situation in US, while she had a freedom to give an interview to a Nepali media.

And I am eager to know the name of this NGO who her so-called husband and mother-in-law is working for? It is good to know so the US money don't go to a wrong hand.

PEACE & LOVE.
Khumbule.