Posted by: Daaku September 23, 2012
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Dharke
All the articles you post seems to have an agenda.You claim otherwise,but it ain't for "educational purpose".Since the federal state movement started gaining momentum,your activity in Sajha seems to be all about finding "articles" and posting them for "educational purposes".
This is getting boring but what the hell eh.?
1)Sikkim is the native land of Lepchas(Rong).The three major ethnic group of Sikkim was Rong(Lepcha),Tsong(Limbu) and Lho(Bhutia).
2)The first Namgyal king ,Phuntsog Namgyal initiated a tripartite treaty of Bhutias,Lepchas and Limbus known as "Lho-Mon-Tsong-Sum".
3)The Namgyal Kings had wives from both the Lepcha and Limbu community.
4)People of Limbuwan and Sikkim were interdependent.They intermarried/traded and whatever came in between
5)Maybe a landgrab here and there or even a brief invasion(which happened on both ends),Limbuwan was NEVER ruled by Sikkimese king ,although there is a possibility that the Sikkimese king might have been an overlord over the Limbu kingdoms at the height of their power.That too is debatable.
6)Sikkim and Limbuwan were very close allies.
7)Limbuwan was never a single kingdom.Limbuwan consisted of 10 rajya and those 10 rajya collectively was called Limbuwan by the outsiders.It's geographical boundaries are not black and white.
8)People speaking the same language,practising the same culture/tradition/religion and sharing the same DNA belong to one clan.Your claim that Bahun/Chettri/Newar living in Limbuwan are Limbus is a JOKE.
9)In a feudal society,commoners being forced to do hard labour is nothing new and people fleeing the feudal lord for a safe haven is not unheard of either.Happens today too.
10)Sikkimese and Limbuwan alliance fought togather against the Gurkhas.
Damn,this is getting long.Please take your hate and slimy intention somewhere else.Tata.
P.S..Dr. Dhungel sure has balls of steel.If he were to debate with historians and anthropologist,he would be eaten alive for his false and tall claims.But he did manage to do what he intended.The poster above me just thanked the doctor for his "educational" stuff.
All the articles you post seems to have an agenda.You claim otherwise,but it ain't for "educational purpose".Since the federal state movement started gaining momentum,your activity in Sajha seems to be all about finding "articles" and posting them for "educational purposes".
This is getting boring but what the hell eh.?
1)Sikkim is the native land of Lepchas(Rong).The three major ethnic group of Sikkim was Rong(Lepcha),Tsong(Limbu) and Lho(Bhutia).
2)The first Namgyal king ,Phuntsog Namgyal initiated a tripartite treaty of Bhutias,Lepchas and Limbus known as "Lho-Mon-Tsong-Sum".
3)The Namgyal Kings had wives from both the Lepcha and Limbu community.
4)People of Limbuwan and Sikkim were interdependent.They intermarried/traded and whatever came in between
5)Maybe a landgrab here and there or even a brief invasion(which happened on both ends),Limbuwan was NEVER ruled by Sikkimese king ,although there is a possibility that the Sikkimese king might have been an overlord over the Limbu kingdoms at the height of their power.That too is debatable.
6)Sikkim and Limbuwan were very close allies.
7)Limbuwan was never a single kingdom.Limbuwan consisted of 10 rajya and those 10 rajya collectively was called Limbuwan by the outsiders.It's geographical boundaries are not black and white.
8)People speaking the same language,practising the same culture/tradition/religion and sharing the same DNA belong to one clan.Your claim that Bahun/Chettri/Newar living in Limbuwan are Limbus is a JOKE.
9)In a feudal society,commoners being forced to do hard labour is nothing new and people fleeing the feudal lord for a safe haven is not unheard of either.Happens today too.
10)Sikkimese and Limbuwan alliance fought togather against the Gurkhas.
Damn,this is getting long.Please take your hate and slimy intention somewhere else.Tata.
P.S..Dr. Dhungel sure has balls of steel.If he were to debate with historians and anthropologist,he would be eaten alive for his false and tall claims.But he did manage to do what he intended.The poster above me just thanked the doctor for his "educational" stuff.
Last edited: 23-Sep-12 09:02 PM