Posted by: _____ May 27, 2012
Login in to Rate this Post:
1 
? 
Liked by
?
Liked by
sirus me,
Yes there is inequality in Nepal. But show me where on this earth there is racial equality. In present day Nepal Y say from (1960, before that it was different Nepal) there is no law which discriminates between races or religion. Requirement of Nepali language is not a discrimination. In US if you dont know english language you can not get govt job and any other reputed job. Same is true in japan china, Russia, germany France. Tell me how many ppl live in US who have mother toungue different thyan english ? Do ppl who have poor english can get govt job in US?
The inequality in Nepal is not because of religion,race or cast.It is because of traditional job distribution pattern. It just happend that the guy who reunited modern day nepal happen to speak certain language. This happend in US too, where before ppl use to speak sort of american indian language, Then Spanish was major language, till 1980 majority of white ppl had german ancestory. It just happend that group of ppl speaking english lead the war, revolution and hence emglish was established as a major means of communication among ppl. Till 1960 in US too there was a debate whather to consider different language (german) as second language, but that didnt happend. now english established itself as only language not only in US but in entire world.
France tried hard to push French as second world language but emergence of internet killed that too. Now if we have Nwpali mentality we may call it english hagemony, but I dont hink so.
If you read the history of the world society esablish itself in one way or the other. Now in Nepal we are trying to revese the flow of the society. So the requirement of Nepali language is not a discrimination.
Reagrding your point educated Nepali janajaati working abroad as cheap labour. my friend do you have any evidence to proove that? if you check the statisdtics you will be surprise to know that there are more so called " upper class" are working as labor abroad.
lots of ppl in nepal the so called " jana andolan" was mainly faught by janajatis. That is also false my friend, equal number of so called "khas" have faught from govt side as well as from maoist side. If you check cast of maoist fighter you will know it. There were more so called " khas" commander in maoist force than janajaati combined..
And if you count the number of "sahid" from maoist about 40% of the sahid are from "khas"
so called "khas" leaders are fighting for equality, So called "khas" are leading the revolution, so called "khas" dead in janaandolan . But in media it is portrayed that it was janajaati who fought the war.
Now dont ask me where I got the data? if you are a serious debater you will find all these data in media. list of maoist warrier from Un, list opf maoist commander leader. and list of people killed and disappeared during the war. it is all there in black and white. find it yourself.
Then ppl put forward very stange argument that, combined number of janajaati is higher than the number of khas, that is true. But in US, number of all non white combind is almost equal to white. But what is the share of non whites in US politics?
It is equivqlent of saying number of votes by amale, kangrs and other minor parties are greater than maoist so maoist is not a major party in nepal. similarly in India combined number of votes Indian minority parties got is more than the vote the Indian kangress aprty got. Does that means other minor parties should run the govt instead the major party.
In yr 2000 popular vot for Al Gore was more than that of Bush, but Bush became president isnt it.
Again those janajaati when come to us, they learn english work hard and many are able to get good job but in Nepal they speak of foul play. This also prves that language is not a barrier for them
If you want to blame for inequality then blame the trditional job distribution, cast system ( which we were not supposed to follow ) and ther is cast system in janajaati too. they also discriminates against lower class among themselves.
blaming so called khas is just a lame excuse. we need to change our law which will provide more oppertunity to ppl those ppl ( need not be janajatis only , they could be bahun, chhetris and janajatis as wel)
Yes there is inequality in Nepal. But show me where on this earth there is racial equality. In present day Nepal Y say from (1960, before that it was different Nepal) there is no law which discriminates between races or religion. Requirement of Nepali language is not a discrimination. In US if you dont know english language you can not get govt job and any other reputed job. Same is true in japan china, Russia, germany France. Tell me how many ppl live in US who have mother toungue different thyan english ? Do ppl who have poor english can get govt job in US?
The inequality in Nepal is not because of religion,race or cast.It is because of traditional job distribution pattern. It just happend that the guy who reunited modern day nepal happen to speak certain language. This happend in US too, where before ppl use to speak sort of american indian language, Then Spanish was major language, till 1980 majority of white ppl had german ancestory. It just happend that group of ppl speaking english lead the war, revolution and hence emglish was established as a major means of communication among ppl. Till 1960 in US too there was a debate whather to consider different language (german) as second language, but that didnt happend. now english established itself as only language not only in US but in entire world.
France tried hard to push French as second world language but emergence of internet killed that too. Now if we have Nwpali mentality we may call it english hagemony, but I dont hink so.
If you read the history of the world society esablish itself in one way or the other. Now in Nepal we are trying to revese the flow of the society. So the requirement of Nepali language is not a discrimination.
Reagrding your point educated Nepali janajaati working abroad as cheap labour. my friend do you have any evidence to proove that? if you check the statisdtics you will be surprise to know that there are more so called " upper class" are working as labor abroad.
lots of ppl in nepal the so called " jana andolan" was mainly faught by janajatis. That is also false my friend, equal number of so called "khas" have faught from govt side as well as from maoist side. If you check cast of maoist fighter you will know it. There were more so called " khas" commander in maoist force than janajaati combined..
And if you count the number of "sahid" from maoist about 40% of the sahid are from "khas"
so called "khas" leaders are fighting for equality, So called "khas" are leading the revolution, so called "khas" dead in janaandolan . But in media it is portrayed that it was janajaati who fought the war.
Now dont ask me where I got the data? if you are a serious debater you will find all these data in media. list of maoist warrier from Un, list opf maoist commander leader. and list of people killed and disappeared during the war. it is all there in black and white. find it yourself.
Then ppl put forward very stange argument that, combined number of janajaati is higher than the number of khas, that is true. But in US, number of all non white combind is almost equal to white. But what is the share of non whites in US politics?
It is equivqlent of saying number of votes by amale, kangrs and other minor parties are greater than maoist so maoist is not a major party in nepal. similarly in India combined number of votes Indian minority parties got is more than the vote the Indian kangress aprty got. Does that means other minor parties should run the govt instead the major party.
In yr 2000 popular vot for Al Gore was more than that of Bush, but Bush became president isnt it.
Again those janajaati when come to us, they learn english work hard and many are able to get good job but in Nepal they speak of foul play. This also prves that language is not a barrier for them
If you want to blame for inequality then blame the trditional job distribution, cast system ( which we were not supposed to follow ) and ther is cast system in janajaati too. they also discriminates against lower class among themselves.
blaming so called khas is just a lame excuse. we need to change our law which will provide more oppertunity to ppl those ppl ( need not be janajatis only , they could be bahun, chhetris and janajatis as wel)