Posted by: rethink April 6, 2012
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Having dual citizenship is like being a member of 2 organizations.
There is nothing wrong with it.
If Organization A says you have to give up your membership at our organization if you take membership at any other organization, then it only shows that Organization A is an absurd, intolerant, narrow minded organization.
The same thing translates into the dual citizenship discussion. Let's say someone lived in Nepal 15 years and lived in US for 15 years, there's no reason why he can't be a citizen of both countries.
It boils down to how narrowminded the organization is. If Organization A was to go on a loss if its member took membership of another organization, then yes maybe they make the rule. But if there is no loss at all for the organization then that rule just becomes STUPID rule.
There is nothing wrong with it.
If Organization A says you have to give up your membership at our organization if you take membership at any other organization, then it only shows that Organization A is an absurd, intolerant, narrow minded organization.
The same thing translates into the dual citizenship discussion. Let's say someone lived in Nepal 15 years and lived in US for 15 years, there's no reason why he can't be a citizen of both countries.
It boils down to how narrowminded the organization is. If Organization A was to go on a loss if its member took membership of another organization, then yes maybe they make the rule. But if there is no loss at all for the organization then that rule just becomes STUPID rule.