don't make conclusions without having any backing for it and come out here and say XYZ user is not relevent enough for me to provide any proof for it  yada yada yada.....make a hypothesis and try to prove it. work your way forward not backwards. so far what i have seen from theists is that they have drawn a conclusive end without any substantial proof and are not willing to move from it. If the girl in the story does not believe there is a country called Nepal is it not upto the story teller to show her that such a country really does exist? or do you go on creating another story with a hypothetical scenario telling her that the way she does not believe in existance of a country is wrong?  if god really does exist why should i have this doubt about it's existance anyway?