Eastsidaz, when u say
  "I dont think this decision was singlehandedly done by BRB, it was done by the party and I seriously doubt Baburam can have any say in this anymore." So what kind of leader is he? I will quote again from Ojaswi A  Leader is one who leads not one who follows


. To become a leader, you have carry all kinds of people on your back because most of the people are selfish and uneducated. They would look for their profit before they would look for their community. 

  So, you are admitting what kind of people are Maoist. If Baburam is not able to convince and influence these people, he is among them for sure.

My point is we can't afford to decelerate the ongoing peaceprocess and nationbuilding effort for one Dhungel dude. Future of our nation is more important than one person's future. You might ask what kind of future we can envision with this kind of law.

So, you prefer a law system where criminals are pardoned by politicians due to their affiliation? It is not Shrestha family that is risking the peace process but it is actually Baburam Bhattrai who is playing with it in crucial time by asking pardon for a convicted murderer.

Well we can address the law after we become a little better in economic front.

Is this a joke? How can you have economic development when you have no law and order? It is has always been evident , it was Maoist who closed down lots of indutries in name of donation, labor disputes and foreign involvement.

 I am not saying Baburam's decision is right but he has not broken any law this time by supporting his cohorts in this decision.

If you know in heart something is wrong, don't try to justify it. He might not have broken any law this time??? He has broken heart of million of Nepalese by this single deicison, who want to see law and order in this country.

Another question, why would Dhungel murder Ujjan if the girl he eloped with was not his sister. The party might have directed this action because it was Ujjan's second marriage and I think maobadis punish a person with two wives( I am not aware of the court ruling) . In that case, it can be defined as a political murder.

Oh wait, few post back you were talkign about remote posibility of Ujjain shrestha murdered for being canditate for Oda Adaksya for Nepali congress which then by the way was largest party in Nepal. Now, your definition of political murder includes people being murdered for having two wives. So, u think Maobadhi have right to punish people with two wives?

Well during the war, many personal murders were politicized in both sides so it's better if we don't get roiled in this quagmire any longer.

Wow...at this point you are saying admiting it was personal murder but you are still defending it saying it is okie to convert these murder case to political case assuming it will be beneficial?? wow I wonder how??

The way I see it, Nepal as a country is better off with criminals like Bal krishna in jail rather than in Cabinet as a minister.