Posted by: wonton October 19, 2011
NRN:taking closer look!!!
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?         Liked by
Jantare if some laws were made 100 years ago, we need to revisit them and make amends.

For example, thesedays when a woman gets married she can choose to keep her maiden name or keep her husbands name along with.

For example we see many women who choose to have names such as Sangita Karki - Subedi or Paula Smith Shrestha or Ramita Sharma - Shrestha.

What kind of husband would forbid a wife to keep her maiden name? That is exactly what Nepali government is doing to Nepalis abroad by disallowing keeping their citizenship.

I am not talking about any organization called NRN, I am speaking for ordinary Nepalis like myself living abroad.

It's not about investment at all. It's simply about being able to come home to Nepal as Nepalis.

WHY NOT? Do you have any reason to deny dual citizenship? Are you simply jealous that someone else has a citizenship in another country so they can't be Nepalis anymore?

It is not an act of treason to take up citizenship of another country, why should we need to have to give up our citizenship? Hundres of countries have dual citizenship why not nepal? Is the thinking of Nepal lawmakers so backwards that they have to keep embracing laws made 100s of years ago?
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article