Posted by: PaulinaDidi September 30, 2011
agent of change or agent of "RAW"
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
Daddyz_here you are RIGHT. Yeap Mohan Baidya Kiran is speaking publicly against Baburam's anti-NATIONALIST agreements with India and the Madhesis and his fall is INEVITABLE.

Well, Baburam's fall is just as inevitable as prachanda's, king's , jhalanath's, madhav kumar nepal's and everybody else's..India just never wants to see Nepal stable, that for sure.

But, looks like now the Baburam government will only last days if a couple of months because his own party people like Mohan Baidya Kiran and Prachanda are just plain UNHAPPY.

I am sure India was mad at Prachanda for playing the china card when he was in power, hence, India prefers Baburam, the SD Muni protege brainwashed in Jwaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi.

If you ever get a chance to see and learn who SD MUNI is you will see he is anything but a fan of Nehru Doctrine and wants nothing but Nepal to be a part of India. When a man like Baburam has a mentor like SD Muni-- this is anything but expected..

I agree Sitaula is another agent of RAW, no doubt about it.

But Rukmangat Katwal too? I am suprised. But its possible.

RAW knows very well which card, which party, which person from which party to use when.


Read Full Discussion Thread for this article