Just becasue someone likes or is grateful to King Mahendra and King Birendra it should not automatically make them appreciate or be grateful to Gyanendra and Paras. Its amazing to see the arguments presented by the royalists. Here are some of the popular lines perception heard from sajha royalists.

1. People should like Gyanendra not becasue of his capabilities but he is less evil than Prachanda

2. People should accept Gyanendra as a king because democracy has failed in Nepal.

3. Birendra and Mahendra were good so Gyanendra and Paras are good as well.

Just becasue Manjushree's father worked for Birendra or Mahendra and was "grateful"  to them, is Manjushree also required to agree and think higly of Gyanendra and Paras? Isin't that what "samanta baad" is about???

If i was a royalist, i would focus more about how Gyanendra/Monarchy is best for Nepal and Nepali people than making a stupid comparison such as "Prachanda is more evil" and "Democracy has failed" excuses.