mr hyde there are too many contradictions on your post, I don't know which one to point out first.

The greatest thing in this is Anuradha Koirala did not do what she did to become a hero. She did not do it for fame. She did it because she cared for Nepali girls. And for saving thousands of innocent Nepalese girls from the hands of heinous criminals, she deserves to be perceived as a hero.

CNN should have awarded top 10 heroes equally but they decided to make a circus out of this by allowing multiple voting. I mean what kind of serious voting allows multiple voting from same person. It's like voting in kindergarten when you would raise both hands to be counted twice.

Listen you folks, I am not taking away anything Anuradha Koirala has done or is doing. I am a big fan of hers. I am only questioning the whole top hero position voting process. Sorry for the title however because I wanted to get some attention heh. I should have put the title as Anuradha koirala may give the hero title back due to questionable voting. OHHO that reminds me, if I was her then I would divide my $100,000 by 10 and give 10,000 to each heroes because the voting system is garbage - don't flame me for saying this hai this is just my opinion at the current time of writing. Comon CNN, don't play with heroes. I seriously feel CNN should be sued for negligent voting system. At least there should have been one vote per email for it to be an incontestable win.

Just because they have some money, they (CNN) don't have the right to bring together 10 highly respectable people from different parts of the world and put them into a reality TV type of show to increase CNN ratings. They made a circus out of these good folks.

Kudos to her effort to save innocent girls like these