That she was selected among top ten heroes speaks volumes of her. For her service to thousands of Nepalese girls who would otherwise live a very harsh life, she is a hero yes.

But the voting process? Not so heroic nor flattering. I am not blaming anyone I am only expressing my opinion that the voting process sucks. In this day and age, CNN allows multiple voting from same person unlimited times. That is not voting, that is a joke. If america elected their president through online voting, Prashant Tamang will become the next President of the US.

Think about it. Why doesn't America elect it's president like that? Answer is because President of US is not a joke but apparently electing CNN hero is pretty much a joke. It's like CNN throwing around some bones to decide which country has more free time in their hands. Bravo it's Nepal where people have all the time in the world to vote as much as 2000 by one person. Great stuff! Next time CNN has to count the hair on Obama's dog Bo's ass, guess which country is gonna get the contract.

I'm loving it though. The whole media psychology. The mob mentality of people with misplaced patriotism and lots of time in their hands.

Those dogs with sheep mentality who accuse me of not respecting her are dead wrong because I am very proud of Anuradha Koirala, what she does and for being chosen as top 10 hero. It just goes downhill from there because of the nasty game CNN decided to play with underdeveloped countries.