"It is difficult to talk to nepalese about anything impassionately."

Why do we always put our own people in a bracket and act as if we are outside of that bracket?? Nepalese always fight, Nepalese always talk behind back, Nepalese this, Nepalese that. Aren't you a Nepali?

"For example, someone is telling me to "imagine " I am a brother of the girls (When do you guys learn that justice is not served by imagining you are the brother of the victims). "

If somebody uses arguments that are so obviously out of the judicial logics, you gotta try using something that the lost soul can related to. If simple logic would have worked, we wouldn't be arguing this case.

You might be building a case about the penal system but your arguments are absurd and appalling.

"But it seems the other vehicle was also driving with the kids without  their belt fastened. So, he is hardly guilty of commiting murder"

Wow!! really?

So, in states where helmet is mandatory, let's say a person blindly fires some round of bullets. One of them hits a motorcyclist in his head and now your argument would be that the person is not guilty because the motorcyclist should have worn a helmet? In Texas, I think wearing seatbelts is mandatory in all seats. So, the defense can make a case to lower down the punishment, but you cannot argue that what he did is wrong and he should be sent to prison for years like everybody else has to.

Them wearing the seatbelt or not doesn't affect any other car/drivers, but the driver driving drunk affects everybody around him. Driving a car intoxicated is a crime that everybody knows about and unless such harsh punishment is instituted the cases cannot be curbed (believe me the incidence would go astronomically up if the law was not in place) and to me a law is not just to punish the criminal but also to set an example so that the crime can be curbed.