Posted by: arahat May 11, 2010
hamro desh ko buddhi nabhayeka buddhijivii
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?         Liked by
Thanks for the reply, Taklu.

You said that some scribe reported that M-badis and Girija had agreed a secret pact to make Sujata the PM - Agreed nothing could have been more disastrous than that happening. But my friend that again is a rumor and a rumor cannot compare to some thing that is already out there - MAKUNE is the PM!  and Sujata is not! 
-> It was not only the rumor; it was the plan that failed. I gave you this example to show that Maos are willing to do anything to be in the government. If you read press archive, you can find out how Sujata was leaning with maoists at that time and Sujata openly supported maos for ousting Katuwal.

Like I said I am not with the M-badis and I am definitely not rooting blindly for them as you are blindly against them. 
-> Sorry, I can't agree with you again. I saw the things maoists are doing and the things they want to do i.e. destroy Nepal and Nepalese; that's why I'm against them. But you're definitely BLINDLY supporting them.

Had our "buddhijivis" taken to streets about 1 year ago when MAKUNE was nominated the PM, i do not think that this point of confrontation between two sects of Nepali janata (the have-alls and the have-nots) would have even erupted. 
-> Why should and would "buddhijivis" come to street to protest MAKUNE? Didn't I write that general people don't care who become PM. For them, everyone is corrupted. This time, general people came to street because their life has been at stake; they don't care about politics. For like any typical communist propagandists, you want to make HUGE issue out of it by saying they're vigilantes; why didn't they do or that earlier. It is not the resposibility of 'buddijivis' to meddle with any petty political issue.

Our Nepali peoples utter disrespect for the system is what has caused this. 
-> If there's anyone in whole Nepal who disrespect the system, it's Maos. Even ex-king respected the decision of the SYSTEM. But Maos only respect only when it's in their favor. AND the whole Nepal knows about it.

Mind you M-badis had won the election with majorti vote some 210+ (i believe) compared to all the "satta-rudh dals" clearly indicating who the Nepalese people want to see in power. 
-> If you respect the system, do you know the rules of the current system? What are the criteria for forming the government in Nepal? Is the present government made from the road hooligans?

But hey are they ruling? - No Mr. MAKUNE is ruling!! Did he even win election? No he lost not in 1 but in 2 places. Clearly we can see what janata wanted but what they got instead. 
-> There is no rule saying that MAKUNE can't be PM. No matter how much you or I hate it, he's the PM and according to our system, the ELECTED members in CA voted for him. Can you see your hypocrisy now? When the system is not in your favor, how you twist it?

So how will he - "Mr Not By-The Poeple" would even be accountable for the people. Of course not, his fortune is not by virtue of people's mandate at all. 
-> What is people's mandate? Are you saying that all those ELECTED members are not people's mandate? Perhaps, if you don't like the current system; you can propose the system where the LOSER can't be PM anymore; but that is not the case yet.

Now I know some people will say why did M-badis run from power when they had it all. For them I give one example - If a CEO of a company cannot fire a watchman who is going against the company policies - then what CEO is he?
-> This analogy doesn't work here because the majority of the company members (board members or shareholders) voted against CEO's decision; so CEO's decision has to be revoked.  There's no communist rule in Nepal yet.

Again, my friends don't judge me and label me. I am just saying wrong is wrong and we should uphold the the truth and fairness no matter what and who benefits from it. Truth always wins and majority counts not the just the Kathmandu elites. Proudly though, I am one too but with the balls to say - we've got it wrong this time folks!!!
-> I agree with all in the above paragraph except about kathmandu elites and balls, lol.
-> Yes, definitely maoists have the ball; that's why they could murder 13,000 innocent nepalese and is still threatening to kill anyone who speaks against them. What made you say that the people on the street were "kathmandu elites"?
-> Are you sure your saying about 'MAJORITY COUNTS'? Please restate this sentence once again so that I can answer to you next time.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article