@dalal: I read this thread earlier also but i didn't felt like commenting because this is that topic which will bring hatred between you and me and i don't like to argue on the things that we cannot come into the conclusion. But i couldn't stop writing when i read your last comment which says "maobadi sakkiyo bhane desh siddincha, ki sikkim huncha ki afghanistan huncha."

First of all think twice before what you write and what were you trying to say. Sikkim is the country which is totally governed by its government and there is no terrorism activities so far af afghanistan is the country which is affected by the terrorism activities. So basically you are trying to say that if terrorism ends in afghanistan than it will be  more worst than what it is right now.. What a BS, dalal bro.. Hahaha... Give me the example of one single freaking country which has been developed when they have civil wars and terrorism activities... That is soo funny... So, according to you is maobadi is gone from Nepal, Nepal would be more worst because the so called politician will make the country more worst huh??? hahha well i think amidstchaos is right that we have to choose one thing in the third world country like Nepal, either corruption or Terrorism and to be honest i would choose corruption rather than Terrorism....