Posted by: user27 February 4, 2010
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
@Radiohead
All the things you said about my post is completely out of context. If you don't agree with my post then, you need to be specific about what and where you don't agree with? just don't accuse me.
Fair debaters don't accuse others, they debate on some point. It's trash who throws the trash inside them on others (just fact not accusation on you). For your ease i'm pasting whatever I posted earlier now this time I expect you to point out specifically what and where you don't agree, it's the way of fair debate.
PREVIOUS POST:
All mysansar is trying including lot of other Nepalese is to state the fact that Lord Buddha was born in NEPAL NOT in india, the point some of you are trying to make saying that it doesn't matter what everybody else thinks but it matters only with that you think doesn't make any sense to the sentiments of other Nepalese. Because to most of people it's more than just a simple fact, it's part of their identity. Nepalese use the terms 'land of Buddha', 'Buddha's birth place' to identify where they come from which justifies the importance of this fact mysansar is bringing up. Lot of you guys might not have come across the situation, where people are getting wrong information about lord Buddha's birth place. If we don't raise the voice against this situation who else is going to make is right in future long after we are gone.
The simple fact is world knows Mt. Everest and Buddha, so we want to associate our identity with them which is our right. Just like indian syaing lord Rama was born in india.
So, what's wrong in mysansar making nepali citizenship of Lord Buddha, as he was born in Nepal and left his palace only after age of 29.
I appreciate mysansar including lots of other media agencies for standing along with us in an effort to spread the fact to rest of the world.
***NOTE: the fact that Buddha was born in Nepal has got nothing to do with anything else. It's not the religious issue.