If you have followed my opinions, I have never supported maoist party for their ultra left line and their terrors. 

Although you have mentioned that you are not defending nagariknews, you are just defending it.

I never said Prachand is an all-time honest leader, but this particular statement, in which he had exposed the degree of control and influence of India in nepalese politics, is definitely an honest assertion - not exaggerated, not twisted. We all know this. I am talking only about this - note "this time" that I have mentioned. 

The word "Direct intervention" is the interpretation of nagariknews editor. Prachanda and his aides have already u-turned their position making such interpretation invalid. But my question was that Nagariknews did not fairly respond to all previous activities which has made Indian stronger and consequently making the ground for direct intervention. 

The makune's statement about calling direct to Indian PM was in media after his return from Copenhagen. I do not have a count who made more trips to Delhi or Indian embassy, but for a sovereign nation, no foreign ambassader should have direct access to the head of the state so frequent. If you or nagariknews editor do not think this noteworthy, then all your words on patriotism is nothing but propaganda.  

Just for record - even if I consider a few of issues maoists talk are genuine, I have never supported them, nor would I think I would ever support their autocratic activities.