Posted by: incrediblesuperbatma September 1, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
1 
? 
Liked by
?
Liked by
Rather than using fowl language, why not take everything into perspective.
Though the article is very much skewed to Maoist ideolism with a touch of scaremongering, I did like the manifestation of problem engrained in Nepali politics and the standard of English used (unlike some of the commentators in Sajha who can only use fowl language that any Tom, Dick and Harry can use; btw for your information Baburam is already doing what you are asking in your comment). Another thing I liked was that the article i.e. the auother, does admit the Maoists' impediments during their tenure. I only hope that people become more conscious and start supporting those who deserve to be supported rather than not listening to the opposition even though that might be for the good for the country. Time to get rid of the Nepali herd culture I suppose.
Though the article is very much skewed to Maoist ideolism with a touch of scaremongering, I did like the manifestation of problem engrained in Nepali politics and the standard of English used (unlike some of the commentators in Sajha who can only use fowl language that any Tom, Dick and Harry can use; btw for your information Baburam is already doing what you are asking in your comment). Another thing I liked was that the article i.e. the auother, does admit the Maoists' impediments during their tenure. I only hope that people become more conscious and start supporting those who deserve to be supported rather than not listening to the opposition even though that might be for the good for the country. Time to get rid of the Nepali herd culture I suppose.