Posted by: lakhe July 25, 2009
ANA and AJAY KUMAR DEV. RAPISTS CONVENTION
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
Sid, I agree with you about the counts of rape. Regarding taking the money, I'm hearing from you for the first time. She was probably lured. I don't know. You mentioned the word "heard"; can court decide the things based on hearsay? I completely disagree that even if your scenario of taking the money for one time by her to be justified for dropping all other rape charges. The other terms, I'll seek is that Rapist was trying to do (by hook or crook) whatever he can to continue the crime he was committing with her. 

I didn't bring having relations; it's you who brought it first getting agitated by reviving this thread.

Regarding citing two other rape cases, it shows how the relatives of the rapist, and in one case even the sister, other family members of the victim tried to protect the rapist in the name of culture, family-relations,  society, etc. They'll then try to assasinate the characters of victim. I don't believe a single word about the alleged character of the victim by the relatives of rapists.

You accused others for rushing to decide. But it's obvious you're the one who wants to decide for the case.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article