Posted by: sidster July 25, 2009
ANA and AJAY KUMAR DEV. RAPISTS CONVENTION
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
Lakhe,

Who is trying to protect the culprit here. I do not have any issues over the culprit getting " Statutory Rape " charges for RAPES ( consent or non consent)  that occurred before the girl was 18.

For the RAPE charges after she turned 18, in my opinion they are baseless because it was heard that she took money to get RAPED couple times, if one takes money to get RAPED, even once, that negates the remainder of 599 rapes. Victim's claim of 500 - 600 RAPES does not add up. Even Jury found the culprit guilty of  RAPES only  1 every three months period chargeable. I wonder what the other so called RAPES were about? Were they just fun RAPES? Let me use a Nepali term here, were the other rapes " doodhbhaat rapes" ( Sarcasm )

Is it logical to call just few encounters RAPES and the other encounters JUST FOR FUN encounters???? Use your head. To me its either all or nothing. It cant be few of them rapes and not the others

Why are you trying to connect a 12 year old girls rape in captivity with a 20 year old free running woman's rape???? Quit trying so hard to prove that i am related to the culprit, if you read through the beginning of this thread i was quite happy with charges put on the culprit. As more information were available i am changing my stance.

Sid
Last edited: 25-Jul-09 03:38 PM
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article