Wow this thread is gonna burst in length. I thought this was a straight-forward case of an incestual sex with a minor - rape or consensual is the question. I am no law pundit, hence I am not gonna advocate for a convict who already had an 'incestual sex' with a minor (that's quite clear). Now it is not gonna tickle my hormones of sympathy for the convict if he did NOT commit rape. Incestual sex with a minor is no less a crime than rape in my book. And I think American judicial system thinks likewise (But again, I am no law pundit)

What is Pire's point though? Seems like he's trying a bit hard here to prove his point. Or may be Ajay Dev'gan is his favorite actor- I would not know. 75 years of prison or 250 years of imprisonment- there is not MUCH difference practically. Semen test- sure. But what would you do to someone who hit and ran and managed to escape law for few months but later found to be guilty of the crime (hit) through other sources? He might escape hit and run but not the crime (hit) which he committed and against which evidences were found intact.

PS I am not sure if 'incestual sex' is a right terminology. Sounds a bit redundant but I am using it anyways for the lack of a better term or for the lack in depth of my knowledge.