â€œhow do you know this is not the time? I am
just curious. As far as I am concerned, it could be the exact time when a bias
is occured.”

I don’t know
it the same way as you don’t know it. If you talk about the probabilities, it
can be probable for everything. But the evidence can not lie.

I say, there
is no probability that jurors are racists. FYI, the jurors are concerned about
the facts and evidence rather than emotions. You’re the one who want’s to
meddle with emotions on top of facts.

“This
is where I am surprised. No evidence, but one sentence said in a heated
conversation established beyond doubt that a man deserves to be in jail. And
that sentence was about "consent", right? Is this the whole proof
behind this lengthy sentencing?”

What kind of evidence
or definitve proof or concrete evidence you’re looking for? Are you interested in
seeing a tape of incestual sex between them? Disgusting! What consent are you talking
about? Don’t you see any crime in having incest; don’t you see any crime in having
sex with a minor? What are you trying to advocate here?

At one point,
you guys want to make him a conservative devoted hindu father; and at other time,
you say he has been americanized. I don’t see juors having to regret. There is
an evidence and many facts exist that points that this rapist is a rapist.

I say, there’s
no equality of sex in Nepal.
Women were accused as witches in Americas,
but in Nepal
they ARE being accused and they ARE being burned.

“Hindus don't condone violence on women.”

If you don’t consider brutal rapings, burnings, chopping, and beatings
as violence, I’ve nothing to say.

“Nepal may be
inching well ahead of America
by now. â€œ

If you’re writing a piece of fiction, I again have nothing to
say.

Pire, you
actually admit you’re a biased person, and you see everyoneelse as the same.