Nepalese politics and the leaders are created and governed by Delhi,
its a hard fact since  1950s. After Ranas the pride of this small nation
and economic condition gradually deteriorated. In those days we were in
the 27th position below the poverty line. If Somalia would not have
been there our position would be the first in this twenty first century. No national leader dedicated for the
nation and the people have emerged yet. The exception was King
Mahendra when he saved the nation from direct Delhi rule, gradually by
sending Indian troops and started governing independent foreign
policy and stopped Indian intervention and direct Indian rule
for which he faced lots of trouble by Indians in the name of Nepali
Congress as long as he lived. Mahendra proved himself by his deeds that
he had Nationalistic approach. Kodari as well as Mahendra Raj Marga was
his dream came true but he was also not able to counter Indian design
completely due to lack of nationalistic leaders who could
have faced Indian challenge from the grass root level. Still
then he introduced Panchayat system which was defamed by his
predecessor Late King Birendra and failed.  






The way seven parties signed twelve point understanding again in Delhi
has given Delhi a upper hand in Nepalese politics. Again India started
to play directly in Nepalese politics like they were used to from 1950s
due to these parties and its leaders.






The way "ganantra" is handled when Bamdev Gautam who lost in the
election became the first deputy PM, Madhav Nepal who lost from two
constituencies became the PM and Sujata who lost miserably in the
election is a foreign minister, Bidya Bhandari is also an election
looser is now the defense minister; clearly indicates that there is no
need of election in Nepal and we are still too immature to call our self a
democratic country. When we could not judge the conduct of the leaders
who ruled since 2046 (Bikram Sambat) and are the only commanding
factor in national politics, who bitterly failed since those years in
governing the nation again and again.





Without strong opposition democracy does
not survive and there is no strong opposition in this country that's
why to save this nation from Indian hegemony a strong leader like Junga
Bahadur is a must for this country?? When all the parties were in favor
of granting non-Nepalese citizenship to five million Indians
then what is the need to call this nation a nation and give people hardship and harassment everyday?? These same leaders used
to
say that they are immature in governing and cannot say when this
interim
period will end? Will they ever be responsible??