Posted by: sidster May 31, 2009
"I have a dream....- Dr. B. R. Bhattarai
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
id now i want you to say
1.Who is Baburam Bhattarai?

Baburam Bhattari is a smart man with an outdated idea, who dreams of bringing changes to his country with arms revolution. He is still sticking to the path that UML and Congress gave up long ago. UML and Congress learned a good lesson with the failure of Arms Revolt and are still defamed for how they formed their parties. Baburam's idea of Arms revolution will make its party look nothing better than Hijackers/Robbers Congress and Head Chopping UMLs.

Its just happened that he was the best finance minister in Nepal in its history. And its not because of his righteousness, its because of his dedication and diligent to his post. Also i do not call him the best politician ever in Nepal history. I think he is the best among all the losers we had who held the post of finance minister in the past.

2. Explain me the meaning of terrorism.

Terrorism is a policy or ideology of violence[1] intended to intimidate or cause terror[2] for the purpose of "exerting pressure on decision making by state bodies."[1] The term "terror" is largely used to indicate clandestine, low-intensity violence that targets civilians and generates public fear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

3.explain me why pravakaran is killed options

C) Pravakaran is killed because SriLankan Army is more dedicated, eligible and intelligent than his own army. He also didnt have enough approval for his terrorist act in SriLanka and Sri Lanka's big brother China assisted Sri Lankan army a lot in getting rid of Prabhakaran.Srilankan army had chinese blessings in getting rid of him is also a reason for his demise.

a)because of his highly threatned nature
b)because he was not smart



3) what you think about american government's thinking even the obama
administration thinks maoist are terrorist and they should surrender
their destructive activities.

I support any government who thinks Maoists are terrorists and should surrender their destructive activities. I have agreed with many things Obama says and does

4)i wan't you to tell me why you call Nepal army terrorist even they are not in the world terrorist list...options
is it because they kicked your dad or because they once kicked prachande's ass/

NA is not Terrorist, because any organation who is in Power is not called Terrorists, they are called Tyrants and Murderers. NA is a demoralized organisation who has no interest to serve its people and given the situation they are willing to follow the same path a terrorist would follow eg: the torture and killing of a 15 year old Child. So it doesnt matter if they are on the list or not. I am sure in your theory the tibetians fighting with arms in china are also terrorists...lol

5) how can you proudly say Nepal army was not able to wipe out maoist....is everything hidden from you?
We saw how incompetent, worthless Army was during the 10 year insurgency. They didnt even have an estimate of how many PLAs there were. While PLAs could get inside info of army on where they would locate and operate but NA would have no clue of PLAs whearabouts. Yes. the actual work needed to be done and those inept team couldnt deliver. You cant expect much from the group who just sits there and eats "maasu bhat" in barrack on poor tax payers money. And gues what happened at the end, the mere 5000 strong PLA got some of what they wanted. That is seculism and Republic. Two of the demands that they went to Jungle for. What did Army get?.....Nothing....Thats why they were not able to defeate Maoists in the conflict. What does NA know about work ethic and responsibility. They are just happy to wash their bosses's wives peticoats and eat Masu bhat paid by poor nepal Tax Payers.


6)why you think maoist temporarily came to peace agreement? do you
think they were growing so large in numbers or do you think they were
in the verge of extinction?

Maoists would like to think that they came to peace agreement as prachanda said in his video, which is to fool the political parties and buy more time to regroup and continue their goal of state capture. But i think Maoist temporarly came to peace agreement because india wanted them to do so. India needed to get rid of King KG and they used Maoists to get rid of KG. Its in India's interest to get Rid of Kings which were seen as obstacles for Nepal to become a full statelite of India.

sidster please don't be offended i
call you opportunist and a thugs who wear a blanket with a potrait of
gandhi coz i have figured them out from a long discussion together....

You can call me whatever you want. You have proved you intellegence in this thread. You are nothing but emotions. I dont get offended if you call me oppurtunists, maoists or Peticoat washer sympethiser. My views are with me regardless of your light arguments.


Last edited: 31-May-09 01:17 PM
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article