We can not imazine a peaceful and prosperous Nepal without Maoists' support, participation and help because our history has already proved that other political parties already failed to do so; they are mostly a bunch of corrupt persons with no vision and political agenda for change and development for Nepal. And, Maoists definitely failed to rule nicely; they were autocratic in many ways; they negleted the feelings of common Nepali people; their intention seemed to be just controlling army and all sectors of Nepal. So, they are not honest for sure. There was a need to change the leadership of the government to a person who is relatively honest to Nepal and Nepali and accepted by people. 

But, when I hear MaKuNe is going to lead our next governmend by doing kune (kothe) rajniti, I am very much disappointed. Does not UML have any visionary leader except this Raja lai daam chadaune MaKuNe, dui dui thau bata rejected MaKuNe, aru leaders lai phutayera aafai 14-15 barsha samma UML ko general secretary khane MaKuNe? Being able to compromize in many issues and agenda within and between parties is not the credential of a good or capable leader; he compromises because he does not have any stance, any agenda, any vision for his own party and for Nepal. I strongly believe Jhala Nath Khanal who is a nationalist among current UML leadership or even Girija who has rigid stance and does not even bow down to India in some issues is far better than this Indian puppet MaKuNe to lead Nepal in this moment of constitution making for Nepal. Among all political leaders I hate MaKuNe the most for last 4-5 years.

What do you think? Is he going to lead new government because he is most suitable person at this hour? Or, he is emerging as a leader just on Indian blessing?

BTW, here is  funny comments about MaKuNe: http://www.mysansar.com/temp/977.html#more-977