Kanchhu,
U might accuse him of being Maoist, but he is NOT. He supports communist ideology though.  I don't think he has given free pass to Maoists on some of the atrocities they have committed. However, there are two sides of the story in every thing. I personally think it was mistakes on the part of Maoists in Ram Hari case, Madi incident etc. Himal Media seemed to be more of a propaganda on the part of the media to defame the Maoists. If it was not so, why did Himal Media agree to come to terms with laborers in the end? Reports had it that they were trying to lay off low-level workers against the rules of the union, so they were forced to agitate. I believe that must have happened too. Personally do not believe in violence and vandalism, but look at Nepal you don't get heard unless you resort to some sort of violence. That was the reality. As for Khagendra Sangraula, he is NOT Maoist. He is an independent left-leaning writer. I don't agree with u  that he is a hypocrite. U just seem to be prejudiced against him, his ideologies. He is just writing what he sees. U may not like it, a lot of people do. We can always agree to disagree. What say you brother?