We could debate this matter as "egg or chicken first?".  The main thing is, how many private schools are not for profit? If they are for profit and people involved in the management are making money then, they should be paying tax. This field has been considered as ``bepar' so should be treated as `` byapari'.  Now it seems like lots of schools are doing 'cocoholo' against this education tax rather than considering paying tax  as a responsibility.   Besides this, by the existing education laws, every private school is supposed to  provide scholarships to at least 10%  of their total students (every school agrees to do this when they apply for approval). I have never seen this happens in practice.  The another way of considering this education tax waived could be provide more scholarship opportunity for needy students.