Posted by: prabhat k January 24, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Darlagdo Manche ji,
First of all let's have something that's called sense.
When Maoists killed so many people for the reasons that they know best, when they would have Indefinite (Anischitkalin Bandha) Strike for weeks and for months in hilly areas, can someone say because prachanda was a DAHAL and Baburam was a BHATTARAI means all DAHAL's and BHATTARAI's are responsible for that.
Here, generalizing even wider, when pahade maoists did all that and no pahade could speak a word because they had weapons, can we say all Pahade's supported the killings? Similarly when Madhesi maoists did that can we say all Madhesis were responsible ? It's a group of people, if u count will be less than 100. Not the entire population whic if u count is in millions. Can u hold the millions responsible for what 100 out of them did ?
When Jwala Singh and co does all this, he is a group, operating by whatever support he has, and its not the entire population of Terai that is doing that? and if u say why Madhesis don't oppose that? Well when Maoists were declared terrorists by state, how many of genuine (no need to be proven) Nepalese people went ahead and protested that in open?? The general public is scared bcoz they have family, kids to take care of.
Don't think who;e Madhesi population wants a separate state, or they support criminals. But for that if the solution is to marginalize them and kick them out, well go ahead. I have nothing to say.
First of all let's have something that's called sense.
When Maoists killed so many people for the reasons that they know best, when they would have Indefinite (Anischitkalin Bandha) Strike for weeks and for months in hilly areas, can someone say because prachanda was a DAHAL and Baburam was a BHATTARAI means all DAHAL's and BHATTARAI's are responsible for that.
Here, generalizing even wider, when pahade maoists did all that and no pahade could speak a word because they had weapons, can we say all Pahade's supported the killings? Similarly when Madhesi maoists did that can we say all Madhesis were responsible ? It's a group of people, if u count will be less than 100. Not the entire population whic if u count is in millions. Can u hold the millions responsible for what 100 out of them did ?
When Jwala Singh and co does all this, he is a group, operating by whatever support he has, and its not the entire population of Terai that is doing that? and if u say why Madhesis don't oppose that? Well when Maoists were declared terrorists by state, how many of genuine (no need to be proven) Nepalese people went ahead and protested that in open?? The general public is scared bcoz they have family, kids to take care of.
Don't think who;e Madhesi population wants a separate state, or they support criminals. But for that if the solution is to marginalize them and kick them out, well go ahead. I have nothing to say.