Posted by: ss74k January 16, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
Portraying Nepalese as a watchman/bahadur is racist, but portraying the slum of a country don't fall in the same category and is not racist.The movie is about slum and its not about mahal. It's the story written by Indian and it is just showing kids living in a slum. What's so offensive about it?The movie shows from slum to thriving economy of Bombay, what is wrong with that? What else they want more than that?After all India has the highest number of child beggar than any country. Some moronic people are proud to boast how many billionare lives in India but compeletly ignores the poor people of the country.
So should we feel offensive when every time the news agency tag Nepal as "one of the poorest country" in the world befor e saying any news.
So should we feel offensive when every time the news agency tag Nepal as "one of the poorest country" in the world befor e saying any news.