Posted by: Nepalibir January 9, 2009
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Riceowls07,
I do not believe most of what u have written, but u never know.However, Paras and Gyane undoubtedly have big roles in the assassination of the King Birendra and his family. I am not a fan of monarchy at all, but among the Birendra was better than his father and assassin brother Gyane. I would not be surprised if India along with other international forces had conspired to assassinate Birendra and his family. I do agree with u that most of the political parties in Nepal are the puppets of India and America. It was a universally accepted fact that NC, RPP, and later UML were dancing to the tune of Indian rulers. Now that the Maoists are in power, they have become way softer toward Indian rulers. I smell rat in their soft stance on the Indian rulers. They haven't even uttered a word about the abroagation of 1950 treaty and so many unequal treaties that they used to talk and write about just before the launch of their "People's War". It may be because they want to remain in power by not displeasing the Indians, but even then it doesn't add up. No wonder why the hardliners in the Maoist party are against Prachanda and Baburam. I think Baburam is a better leader than Prachanda. He is not as controversial as Prachanda either. When it comes to qualification, no one even comes closer to him among the Nepalese leaders. In an ideal Nepal, the government would punish the corrupt people, discourage nepotism and favoritism, and fight against the Indian Expansionism. Maybe it is too much to ask for as of now looking at the activities of the political parties.
I do not believe most of what u have written, but u never know.However, Paras and Gyane undoubtedly have big roles in the assassination of the King Birendra and his family. I am not a fan of monarchy at all, but among the Birendra was better than his father and assassin brother Gyane. I would not be surprised if India along with other international forces had conspired to assassinate Birendra and his family. I do agree with u that most of the political parties in Nepal are the puppets of India and America. It was a universally accepted fact that NC, RPP, and later UML were dancing to the tune of Indian rulers. Now that the Maoists are in power, they have become way softer toward Indian rulers. I smell rat in their soft stance on the Indian rulers. They haven't even uttered a word about the abroagation of 1950 treaty and so many unequal treaties that they used to talk and write about just before the launch of their "People's War". It may be because they want to remain in power by not displeasing the Indians, but even then it doesn't add up. No wonder why the hardliners in the Maoist party are against Prachanda and Baburam. I think Baburam is a better leader than Prachanda. He is not as controversial as Prachanda either. When it comes to qualification, no one even comes closer to him among the Nepalese leaders. In an ideal Nepal, the government would punish the corrupt people, discourage nepotism and favoritism, and fight against the Indian Expansionism. Maybe it is too much to ask for as of now looking at the activities of the political parties.