NS: "Maoist and then royals killed Madan bhandhari. Many of you may disagree. I have a reason. UML got sometime leadership he was happy. UML even couldn't set up a testifying committee. Congress gave damn because wasn't from his party. Then royal got opportunity to weaken multiparty system and Maoist got anchorage for Royals. Who do you think benefited most? and moreover why would Maoist kill "Amar lama" and "krishna Mohan"? If congress or UML were responsible they wouldn't have freed him."

I used to believe that the massacre of Madan Bhandari and the other (sorry forgot name) is plotted by Indian Intelligence (RAW), Congress and Royalist. But I can not argue in detail. I just remember that Girija, the PM of that time, was not interested to co-operate the investigation. He wanted to diffuse the case as fast as he could. But your theory is something new one. Could you elaborate on this ?

Jwala, you sound like khattam babu of mysansar. I don't buy any of your logic and proof that you presented in favor of maoist leaders. You don't know how much Mahara has collected bribe. NS mentioned the story of the gold-plated wrist watch Prachanda puts on. Prachanda's wife recently received a 4WD SUV. Mr. Lekhnath Bhatta and Mr. Jamarkattel have purchased lands of multi-million rupees in KTM. Many of these bribe-stories are about to unfold and some have started to suface out.

Nepe, the views you communicate with your closemates in the google groups are interesting to read, but it would be better to re-arrange the lines instead of copying directly, because, that just sounds like you are advertizing your private googlegroup here.

I donot think the "People's republic" is only a jargon to fool their indoctrinated cadres. Even if it is, they don't have any right to fool their own cadres. It sounds exactly similar to Prachanda's Kalo Topi policy. When he lands on foreign soil, he takes off, and when he lands on Nepalese soil, he puts on.