Mav,
I am surprised that you didn't "see" the reasoning part in the post posted by Loote. Hint: the reasoning part is in bold and is in the last paragraph. It should not have been a surprise afterall since Hillary was the favorite among those without a college degree. hehe..jk

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of Al Qaeda. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.

We can go over it at length if you still don't see the  reasoning part.